Why, oh why, would you, , implement so incorrectly?

> PPP over Q-in-Q encapsulation supports configurable outer tag Ethertype. The configurable Ethertype field values are 0x8100 (default), 0x9100, and 0x9200.

Why not use 0x88A8 like everybody else? Why would you not even consider this standard value as an acceptable config?

F*** U, Cisco.

@x_cli are you actually expecting competence from Cisco?

They behave like Microsoft did on the 80’s and 90’s. Basically they tell you what values to use. And if you don’t like it. We tell you why you should like it.

Standards. We make our own standards.

All I can really do is wish you luck.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Infosec Exchange

A Mastodon instance for info/cyber security-minded people.