This wired article ( wired.com/story/join-mastodon- ) about Mastodon is mostly good. It covers the basic features and talks about a shift from Twitter to Mastodon.

It confuses one key issue though, and that’s the “culture” of Mastodon.

What we’re seeing now across the Fediverse are the first adopters. The fringe. The queer. The hackers. The staunch individualists. The communal care takers.

As Mastodon becomes more mainstream, the “culture” will shift.

If you’re here for the culture, be wary... 1/2

Mastodon at it’s heart is a software application wrapped around a federated protocol.

Anyone can use it. Spin up an instance by thenselves or join one they like. It can federate with any other software application using ActivityPub. It is decentralized. HIGHLY resistant to censorship.

And this last part is key.

This platform is IDEAL to users that espouse unpopular viewpoints: fascism, hate, calls for violence, illegal content, etc. 2?/2...

While the culture is of first adopters and is open and affirming right now. Nazi’s and Fascists and $BAD_ACTOR’s will move in once they realize they can’t be censored or kicked off their own instance.

Those who left twitter because Jack didn’t ban folks there are going to be sorely disappointed when they realize that (while folks can be banned from one instance) they can’t be banned from their own instance. 3/2

@tinker that’s true, but we have had discussions about that eventuality. Basically, the only recourse will be instances blocking other instances that exhibit bad behavior. I am not sure what we’ll see first: Nazi-haven instances or spammer-haven instances. Both will have to be addressed the same way. Ultimately, the fediverse is going to have to (like it or not) develop a reputation system for instances (which are optional to use) to make moderation tolerable.

@jerry @tinker

In terms of condoning, enabling, and promoting alleged human trafficking, slavery, rape, misogyny, and sexual abuse, not to mention unethical activities of other kinds, mastodon.social has already faced this issue of a rogue instance, switter dot at.

The admins have utterly failed in their responsibilities in this regard, & even to acknowledge that there is a problem in federating with switter.

@Gargron @CM_chrismartin @CM_noelle @Yukari @vaporbobble @CM_jusdepatate @cm_kropot

Follow

@hhardy01 -

And see, I don’t see switter as a rogue instance. I see it as a place sex workers can congregate. Sell their services to consenting adults. And (more importantly) put out warnings & bulletins on bad actors so they can protect themselves.

Cool thing though. *YOU* can block that entire instance. Why haven’t you?

@jerry @Gargron @CM_chrismartin @CM_noelle @Yukari @vaporbobble@mastodon.social @CM_jusdepatate

@tinker @jerry @Gargron @CM_chrismartin @CM_noelle @Yukari @vaporbobble @CM_jusdepatate

Is your idea of prostitution that it is all independent entrepreneurs happily and safely engaging in legitimate business?

What have you got to say about organized crime, human trafficking, rape, child abuse, opiate abuse and misogyny which allegedly often accompany prostitution even where it is fully legal and regulated? I can't say for sure that this is the case on switter, wouldn't be surprised.

@tinker @jerry @Gargron @CM_chrismartin @CM_noelle @Yukari @vaporbobble @CM_jusdepatate

You asked, "Cool thing though. *YOU* can block that entire instance. Why haven’t you?"

Closing your eyes doesn't make bad things go away, nor does it free you from moral responsibility to speak up about them. You know that, right?

@tinker @jerry @Gargron @CM_chrismartin @CM_noelle @Yukari @vaporbobble @CM_jusdepatate

Just to be very clear, I'm not advocating that sex work should be illegal. My position is protecting safety of workers and others and harm reduction.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Infosec Exchange

A Mastodon instance for info/cyber security-minded people.