@fluffy
There's no reason for anybody to pre-emptively ban an instance. The only exceptions (instance posts CP/other strict liability content) also happen to be the only appropriate use cases for instance wide blocking.
People should block instances when they find a reason to do so. If someone needs an instance that attempts to shield them from all negativity, I'm sure there are a few, but thats niche
@angristan @rotawerx
@fluffy @angristan @rotawerx
More to the point, if someone needs to be pre-emptively shielded from all negativity, they may wish to put the computer away.
Nick Jr., Noggin, and Sprout are still broadcasting for their convenience.
@r000t @fluffy @angristan @rotawerx
"More to the point, if someone needs to be pre-emptively shielded from all negativity, they may wish to put the computer away."
"Negativity?"
Is that what you call Fascism and Nazism?
Why the euphemism?
Are you hiding what you are really saying, even from yourself?
@hhardy01 @fluffy @angristan @rotawerx
Nope.
I wasn’t hiding anything, I meant what I said. Some people don’t want anything with a negative tone, period, about anything, and I don’t think those people should be on the Internet. It’s not good for them.
You, on the other hand, made the jump you accused me of. Oops.
@r000t @fluffy @angristan @rotawerx
So should nazi and fascist instances be peered with, or not?