Fascinating read on how the FBI ran Anom encrypted phone company. In particular:

“We wanted to shatter the trust in the encrypted phone industry that catered to criminals.”

The question remaining is: how can we as non-criminals still trust encrypted messengers?

vice.com/en/article/m7e733/ano

The FBI had to disclose their operation at some point for legal reasons. Russian or Chinese APTs are not bound by such rules. How do we know that they haven’t compromised some encrypted messengers already and are reading all communications?

And with Signal making rather questionable crypto decisions lately, how do we know who is currently pulling the strings there?

palant.info/2020/06/16/does-si

Follow

Yes, it’s easy to get all paranoid here. The big question is whether the paranoia is justified, and I don’t expect the answer to turn up any time soon. All we get is a suspicion that there might be more things going on than busting drug cartels.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Infosec Exchange

A Mastodon instance for info/cyber security-minded people.